Sunday, September 13, 2009

Tales of the Arabian Nights

I've been really enjoying this new game from Z-Man. You get to wander the world of the Thousand and One Nights, encounter strange people and customs, and try to make your fortune. There is a whole genre of what I think of as "experience games", games where you play to watch the stories unfold as much as anything else. Games like Arkham Horror, American Megafauna, maybe Britannia and Republic of Rome. A surprisingly large number of wargames, like Paths of Glory or Successors, and arguably a lot of games which are too huge to realistically play to actual conclusion, like Case Blue or Guderian's Blitzkrieg. I also feel many of GMT's games where you wrestle far more with rules and processes than you do with actual decisions fall into this category; Fields of Fire certainly, and games from The Burning Blue to 1805: Sea of Glory and PQ-17 also feel to me like they get filed here.

So anyway, back to the topic. I think what appeals to me so much about Tales of the Arabian Nights, apart from the great flavor, is that it is an experience game which actually works. Yes, the stories it generates as you have your adventures are usually great fun and the real reward of playing. But you also have to actually play the game. You can't just do stuff because it sounds cool or you want to see what happens; you have to play to your character's strengths, trying to use the skills you've been given or have earned to their best advantage. Courting the Wealthy Princess may sound cool, but if you don't have the Courtly Graces or Seduction skills, it's probably not a percentages play, either from the point of view of winning or generating an interesting story. You have to play to your strengths.

With this in mind, I think a key to enjoying the game is the right attitude. You can't come at it either trying to "generate cool stories" or getting too hung up on winning. I think you have to realize that the game is pretty random, and even if you play the best game possible you may well get hosed. On the other hand, if you don't play to win, you aren't going to generate the most (or even any) interesting stories. So take Knizia's advice to heart, and realize that you do have to play the game to win, but the actual winning itself isn't the important thing.

I'll finish with a couple more concrete tips and observations.

Firstly, on the question of how to choose your victory conditions of story points vs. destiny points: This is a tough call and it's unfortunate that the rules don't give you a little guidance on this, since it's an important decision that you make up-front with little to no information. My sense has been that Story points are a little easier to come by than Destiny, so that argues for favoring Story a little bit. A possibly more important factor, though, is that there is a fairly common status, Scorned, which turns all your Destiny points into Story points. There are also a few other fairly common Statuses that allow you spend Destiny for some effect, and Crippled (which doesn't seem that common) doubles your Story points. On the flip side, Story Point losses, spends, or conversion to Destiny seem very rare (I haven't seen any, but they could be out there). It's still a bit of a shot in the dark, but I think it pays to favor Story points. Scorned seems to come up a lot, and if your objective points are split close to 50/50, it can be a real back-breaker.

Secondly, some folks I've played with have griped a little bit about the early game, a gripe with which I am not unsympathetic. The first phase of the game seems to involve wandering around a bit a trying to make something happen, looking for a break. You're comparatively unskilled at that point, so it doesn't feel like you are able to exert that much control until you've gained some experience. Thematic, but it can make the early game a little unsatisfying. We were pondering minor variants you could use to tweak things a bit, and I think we hit on a good one: just allow the players to pick 4, or even 5 skills at start instead of 3. It seems like it would do no fundamental violence to the game and it would give you a better shot at managing the encounters in the early game, and would let you fit more action in to the same game length. We had a discussion about whether you could get one starting skill at Master level for the cost of two skills, but were undecided. Master level skills are a significant advantage in terms of guiding your destiny, and it seemed like something that should have to be earned. Regardless, personally I don't mind the early game of wandering in the wilderness, but I can see that overall this might improve the game for a lot of folks.

Lastly, keep the player count on this game down. The box advertises up to 6, but that just seems nuts. I'd say you should cap it at 4, and 3 is probably preferable. While you aren't the current player or the reader, Tales of the Arabian Nights is almost pure downtime. There is only so much fun to be had listening to other players' stories. Some, certainly – enough for a 4-player game, I think – but add more players and it gets pretty attenuated.


  1. Chris, I've played this once, and had a blast, but I had the opposite conclusion about whether the game actually takes your skills into account. It felt to me that making choices based on my strengths didn't matter -- the paragraph would test some seemingly random skill. Although fun and interesting, I was disappointed that I couldn't in fact make at least vaguely strategic choices. I hope you're right and I'm wrong though -- I'll have to play again to see.

  2. I do agree that the game is quite random, and making smart choices certainly does not guarantee success - a lot of the time the required skills do seem to come out of nowhere, and you can get slapped with nasty statuses for no good reason. But I think if you persevere in making good choices, it makes it a lot more likely you'll get the couple breaks you need to win, and more likely you'll get good story hooks. On the flipside, making random choices makes getting those breaks pretty hard.

    This is one reason the master-level skills are so valuable. I cheated a little bit and picked half-a-dozen reaction matrix entries at random to see what skills were useful. Almost always in the three relevant paragraphs there were a range of skills that were about what you would expect, but that might mean 5 different skills (so for Court, as mentioned above, the three paragraphs might cover Seduction, Courtly Graces, Beguiling, Acting, or Appearance). Obviously, a master level skill, where you can hone in on the relevant paragraph, makes getting your skill into play a lot easier.

  3. OK, I have to revise my destiny/story point advice ... we played again last night and we were awash in Destiny but Story seemed hard to come by (we all went with somewhere between a 12/8 and 14/6 split Story/Destiny split, so the game didn't end until I had like 14 Story and 16 Destiny). But, we all were Scorned at one point and opted to get rid of it right away instead of using the time to beef up our Story point counts. Scorned has some other nasty side-effect though (like, I think you can't gain new skills).

    So, I dunno. Maybe the 50/50-ish split is the way to go. I feel like there is some method to the Story/Destiny awards, but I can't quite figure it out. On our last game, my frequent use of Piety and Wisdom seemed to bring more Destiny, points, while a player who went with Stealth and Stealing and Quick Thinking seemed biased more towards Story. That would make sense, but on the other hand, it could have been just a one-game anomaly.

    Couple other notes:

    Our last game we played starting with 4 skills instead of 3. It seemed to work quite well. I think starting with 5 would definitely be too many though.

    Also, note that there is some fairly major map errata, available on Z-Man's site. If you don't play with it, the southern tip of India becomes insanely difficult to navigate around. How that got connection got dropped, I'm not sure.

    Last thing, there are some pretty nasty statuses in the game. Most of them (Insane, Accursed, Scorned) I'm OK with, but one we ran into was particularly egregious: Sex-Changed. The problem is that you can't win while Sex-Changed, and there seems no clear route to getting rid of it. We might house-rule that one.

  4. Agree that there is actually some thinking behind what action to choose based on your skills although it doesn't always work out to your advantage.

    On the Destiny/Story Points issue, I think the spread should not be more than +-3 and while not an exact science, your initial quest may help you make a better decision, i.e., if it awards more Destiny, then skew towards Destiny. And yea, Scorned is bad (don't keep it).

  5. Maxo says...
    Tales of the Arabian Night has a problem (which is okay if you go with it).

    Courting the princess *rarely or never* seems to use courtly graces or beguilement. Instead, attacking or robbing is the best option. The game is perverse. There is not a lot of logic to which skill works in which situation.

    It's humorous once you get used to it but it drove my son in law to fits the first time he played it. "Why not just roll a dice and decide who wins!?!?! It would have saved three hours of my life!?!?!!"